Rebuttal to NASA's Claim of No Effect of Earths' Magnetic Fields on Climate Change ( deleted by LinkedIn )

 

NASA Climate Change Team is funny. This article of theirs is dead wrong missing all the salient details completely with whitewashing the real effects of actual salient changes in earth's magnetic field in south South Atlantic.

https://lnkd.in/de23bpzC

https://climate.nasa.gov/blog/3104/flip-flop-why-variations-in-earths-magnetic-field-arent-causing-todays-climate-change/  ( or why the earths magnetic field changes are in fact doing so and nothing from Carbon as a weakling greenhouse gas 100x smaller in GHG than CLOUDS despite NASA's blatant error )

The Nasa claims are out and out false by convenient omissions of facts throughout their blog post. Rife with irrelevant facts immaterial to actual causes of climate change.

My rebuttal follows ( deleted by LinkedIn and unclear if Google will permit either. )

 Your ( the NASA ) article misses the main effects, huge drop in earth's magnetic field in south South Atlantic between South America and Southern most South Africa, and you totally ignore that a drop in earths regional local magnetic field only changes global warming by hugely affecting cloud formation and hence weather patterns across the world. 

You skirt the issues with pablum of global averages and claiming that pole flips are the major effect which they are irrelevant presently. The sun's ions form clouds when hitting the earth's atmosphere and this is the major source of GHG warming and not carbon emissions in the slightest ( 1% effect of carbon bearing gases versus clouds and their formation and density ) 

It is convenient to ignore that the recent pandemic with reduction in carbon emissions had zero impact on climate change / chaos which is convenient to ignore but salient as a test of carbon based global warming ( none there in the slightest )

Your article skirts the salient actual mechanisms of magnetic field effects which is upon cloud formation and nothing else relevant. Your thesis is more like politics than science despite the source you are ( but are in fact not ). 

I used to work in sustainability /  climate change but found later it to be a farce as is your claim of no magnetic field effects ( surely dead wrong flat earth science bullshit ). Chew on this and fess up to the whitewashing of your non article, it is utter nonsense by avoidance of real science. Your article misses the main effects, huge drop in earth's magnetic field in south South Pacific between South America and South Africa, and you totally ignore that a drop in earths regional local magnetic field only changes global warming by hugely affecting cloud formation and hence weather patterns across the world.

You skirt the issues with pablum of global averages and claiming that pole flips are the major effect which they are irrelevant presently. The sun's ions form cloud when hitting the earth's atmosphere and this is the source of actual greenhouse gas warming and not carbon emissions in the slightest ( 1% effect of carbon bearing gases versus 100x GHG effects of clouds / water vapor, and the clouds formation and density )

It is convenient to ignore that the recent pandemic with reduction in carbon emissions had zero impact on climate change / chaos, which is convenient to ignore but salient as a test of carbon based global warming ( none there in the slightest )

Your article skirts the salient actual mechanisms of magnetic field effects which is upon cloud formation and nothing else relevant. The article's hypothesis is more like politics than science despite the source you are ( but seem not to be ).

I used to work in sustainability /  climate change but found later it to be a farce as is your claim of no magnetic field effects ( surely dead wrong  Carbon emissions is flat earth science bullshit ). Clouds are the main source of Green house Gas warming, not carbon bearing gases.

Chew on this and fess up to the whitewashing of your non article. It is utter nonsense by avoidance of the real science with smokescreen of irrelevant "facts". It is not about pole flips or magnetic field averages at issue, it is about the south South Atlantic's massive reduction in magnetic field's goings on.

Feel free to copy and repost this post as you deem useful and necessary.

I think what did it for me initially, was finding about about Penn State's Prof. Michael Mann's fraud ( and by association Al Gore's too ) validated in loss of a lawsuit by Prof. Dr. Tim Ball, an actual Climate Scientist trained in England and working in Winnipeg Canada. Dr. Mann ( no weather science training ) lost in BC Superior Court. Mann over 11 years, as Mann refused to hand over the input data used to Produce his falsehoods ( the infamous hockey-stick CO2 temperature graph ), and the BC Superior Court Judge deemed it false and unverifiable, unlike most all peer reviewed science is required to be vetted.